Send us the link. We confirm the legal ground before you commit to anything.
Start a free assessmentRemoval-first reputation management
Our online reputation management services remove the harmful items themselves — fake or defamatory reviews, unlawful posts and videos, impersonation accounts and search results that qualify for de-indexing — through platform policies, GDPR, DMCA and defamation notices, and Google's removal policies. There's no retainer or monthly fee: each item has a published price from $350 and its own timeframe, from 48–72 hours for a review, and you pay only when it's removed.
No link to hand? Start this removal How it works
Scope
How it works
Send the links: reviews, posts, videos, search results, accounts, websites. We assess each one separately and tell you which have a real policy or legal ground for removal, and which don't.
Each removable item comes with its route (platform policy, GDPR, DMCA, defamation or Google's removal policies), its published price and its timeframe. You choose what to go ahead with. Nothing is bundled.
Each removal goes through the right channel: platform reports and legal teams, formal notices, search-engine removal requests, or host and registrar abuse teams. When the first answer is no, we escalate.
Every item is billed on its own, with no bundle and no monthly fee. You pay only when it's removed. If we can't remove it, you don't pay — any deposit is refunded in full.
Legal grounds
Every major platform prohibits harassment, impersonation, privacy violations, non-consensual imagery and fake engagement — and runs formal legal and privacy request channels beyond the public report button.
In the glossary →People in the EU/EEA (and the UK, under UK GDPR) can require organisations — search engines included — to erase personal data that is inaccurate, outdated, unlawfully processed or no longer necessary, balanced against freedom of expression.
Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Art. 17 ↗False statements of fact that damage a reputation can be removed on legal notice, and in some cases by court order. If a case needs a court order, we tell you up front.
In the glossary →US hosts and platforms keep their safe harbour only if they expeditiously remove material identified in a valid notice from the copyright owner or an authorised agent.
17 U.S.C. §512(c) ↗Google removes certain results from Search on request: doxxing content and personal contact details, non-consensual intimate imagery, results from sites with exploitative removal practices, and content subject to valid legal requests.
Google Search Help — removal policies ↗Already reported it?
Many reputation problems reach us after a failed attempt: a review flag that came back 'no violation', a report button that went nowhere, or a proposal to publish content until the bad result slips to page two. A first refusal from a moderation queue isn't a legal decision. We escalate through the channels behind the button: appeals with better evidence, formal notices under defamation law, GDPR or the DMCA, and Google's own removal policies for search results. If an item can only come down with a court order, we tell you up front. If it can't come down at all, we tell you that too.
Online reputation management services generally sell one of three things. Monitoring software tracks reviews and mentions and helps you reply. Suppression programmes publish new profiles, articles and pages to push negative results further down Google. Retainers bundle both into a monthly fee, usually for months at a time. None of them removes the content that's doing the damage.
Suppression has a place when nothing can lawfully be removed. But the original stays online, it can climb back whenever rankings shift, and search features and AI assistants can still surface it. We work the other way round: remove what has a legal ground first, then tell you honestly what's left and what your options are.
Retainer-based reputation management is billed by the month, whatever the outcome. We publish a price for each type of removal and bill each one only when it's done, so the cost of a clean-up is the sum of what is actually removed. These are our published prices and working timeframes:
If the content is a fair and accurate news report, an honest review or criticism you disagree with, there is no lawful ground to remove it, and we won't pretend otherwise. A measured public reply, a correction request to the publisher, or simply time is often the better answer.
If the problem is your own listings being wrong or out of date, you can fix those yourself in each platform's business dashboard. And if only a court order can get something removed, we tell you before you commit, because that changes the cost and the timeline. We're not a law firm, so court action would mean instructing a lawyer.
Proof, not promises
You pay only when it’s removed. If we can’t remove it, you don’t pay — any deposit is refunded in full.
Case files
A website publishing defamatory claims was traced through the CDN in front of it to its origin host and removed on legal notice.
OperationA live phishing page impersonating Poste Italiane was reported to its host and registrar under their abuse policies and taken down.
Questions
With retainer agencies, it's usually a monthly fee for as long as the programme runs. With us there's no monthly fee: each removal has a published price, from $350 for a review to $1,500 per search result and $7,700 for an impersonation account. You pay only for items that are actually removed.
It depends on what they do. Suppression can push a result down but leaves it online, and monitoring tools help you respond but remove nothing. Removal works when the content breaks a platform's rules or the law, which is why we assess every item first and tell you plainly which ones qualify.
Removal takes the content down at the source, or takes the URL out of search results through a de-indexing request. Suppression leaves it in place and tries to outrank it with new content. A removed item is gone from that address; a suppressed one is still there for anyone who scrolls, and can climb back after a ranking change.
Only where there's a legal ground: a false statement of fact, a GDPR claim where the story names you or a colleague personally, or a breach of a search engine's removal policies. Accurate, lawful journalism stays. For old or inaccurate stories, de-indexing the URL from search results is often the realistic route, and we tell you if that's the case.
No. There's no retainer, no monthly fee and no minimum term. You send the items, we quote each one, and each is billed only when it's removed; if we can't remove it, you don't pay and any deposit is refunded in full.
Removing content through platform reports, legal notices and search-engine requests is lawful; those channels exist for exactly this purpose. Fake reviews, paid fake engagement and threats against honest critics are not, and in the US the FTC's consumer-review rule prohibits them. We don't do any of it.
Related removals
Free, confidential assessment
Send the link. We confirm the legal ground and the price before you commit to anything.
Prefer email?info@getnullify.com · You pay only when it’s removed. If we can’t remove it, you don’t pay — any deposit is refunded in full.